Sunday, January 27, 2008



Boy, isn't that the truth?

I get these catalogues in the mail, Title Nine and Athleta chief among them, that contain athletic wear and active wear for women. The clothing sold by these companies is intended for women with "active lifestyles", you know, women with interesting and powerful jobs who then have time in the afternoons to go out for a quick ski/mountain bike ride/surf/rock climb/marathon. All of the women in these catalogues are trim, toned, perky, athletic, and purely capable of running a board meeting in a skort. These are the women I would like to be. But as the cartoon above suggests, all of these clothes the women in these catalogues wear are designed for women who ALREADY LOOK LIKE THAT. Where are the cute, sassy, mildly-granola-earthy clothes for those of us who are pudgy, rounded, slouchy, and unlikely to have the opportunity to frolic in the surf in the afternoons?

My goal is to someday resemble a woman who could theoretically be featured in one of these catalogues, even if I can't scamper out for a quick run down a volcano before dinnertime.

Sunday, January 20, 2008

I hate the New England Patriots. I think with their win today over my San Diego Chargers, they may have just surpassed the Oakland Raiders as my most hated team (I mean, when was the last time the Raiders were really a threat?). During the first half of the AFC Championship game, it looked like my Chargers were the better team and just hadn't managed to get into the end zone yet. In the second half, New England did what they did best: adjust to the other team's defense. Since they couldn't throw the ball, they just picked their way down the field with their running game. Shit.

My only hope now is that the Green Bay Packers take out the New York Giants (don't really have anything against the Giants, but I think the Pack has a better chance to win) and then go down to Arizona and end the Patriots perfect season hopes.

Bring me the head of Tom Brady on a platter!

Friday, January 18, 2008

OK, I'm sure we all agree that the website I Can Has Cheezburger can be kind of funny from time to time, and also kind of annoying with all its cute and hackerish misspellings and grammatical errors. The so-called "LOLcats" and their tagged pictures range from extremely funny to pretty boring.

But every once in a while you come across a picture that is just too funny to be ignored.

Funny Pictures
moar funny pictures

Does anybody see a resemblance to Bucky from the comic "Get Fuzzy"? Or perhaps Solange from "9 Chickweed Lane"?




I want this cat!

Sunday, January 13, 2008

Now that the football games for the day are over, I am tickled to find my Chargers going to the AFC Championship game, for the first time since they defeated the Steelers in the same game on Jan. 15, 1995. Now I really, really hope they can take out the Patriots. I'm pretty freaking tired of listening to the hype.

But I have to laugh about something one of the commentators just said at the end of the Giants-Cowboys game: "There is a Manning playing in a championship game next week, and his name is not Peyton." I thought that was pretty dang funny.

Anyway, I am waiting for next week. I sure hope my team can be the Patriots. If not, I sure hope the Packers or the Giants can beat the Patriots. If not, I hope some guy in a dark alley can beat the Patriots, because I'm f*%&^*$ sick of them. Seriously.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

We've discovered over the years of owning video games that they are great time-wasters.  I knew this, of course, from childhood, although I never did own an Atari (we had an Odyssey 2000).  My husband and I purchased a Sega Dreamcast when they were the "thing" (remember the commercials: "It's thinking"?) and played Midway's Hydrothunder until our brains melted. We still own the console for the sole purpose of occasionally pulling it out and playing it for old-time's sake. Then we got an Xbox. We promptly wasted a great deal of time playing such games as Halo, Gauntlet: Legends, X-Men, and Splashdown. Of course, when the Xbox 360 came out, we had to get that too. We added to our time-wasting games (Halo 2 and 3, Gears of War, and Bioshock) in quick succession.

We've finally met the category of ultimate time-suckers: the Guitar Hero series (and hopefully soon Rock Band). Oh, man.

Guitar Hero comes with a controller shaped like a guitar (you can play with a regular controller, but who would want to?). On the neck of the guitar are five fret buttons that can play notes and chords. On the body of the guitar are a strum bar and a whammy bar.



As the songs play, the screen shows the neck of a guitar (along with some background of a concert and a rock band playing). Moving towards you are the notes that you must play. The color of the note and the placement indicate the note to be played and the duration of the note. As the notes reach the circles at the bottom of the screen, you press the corresponding buttons on the frets and strum the bar.



There's a pretty wide variety of songs on these games, from classic rock to heavy metal to alternative. They vary in levels of difficulty as well, so for each level you increase in difficulty as you play the game. There are four levels the songs appear in: easy, medium, hard, and expert. The same song that seemed so easy on the easy level can turn into a real bitch very quickly. We noticed a significant increase in difficulty just between the easy and medium levels. The hard level is the one we're working on now, and it really is hard. I shudder to think of the expert level.

As with any video game, the longer you play, the better you get. I certainly would like to beat the game on the expert level. But I may or may not get there. I don't plan to spend all my spare time on this game (not that I have that much spare time to begin with).

Here's what happens when you spend too much time on the game:

This is a video of someone playing the really awesome song "Cliffs of Dover" by Eric Johnson on the expert level and getting a 100% accuracy rating.

This video is of the final boss battle (against Satan), playing a really kick-ass guitar version of The Charlie Daniels Band song "The Devil Went Down to Georgia".

Of course, as with any video game, there is a danger of children spending too much time playing it. All kids should spend some time playing something, but it's definitely healthier to send them outside to play tag or something. Here's a little kid who should TOTALLY join a little league team or something, because he needs to get outside and away from this game!

Guitar Hero is a seriously awesome game. The game Rock Band takes the idea a big step further. With the multiplayer mode, you can have four people who each get to take a different role in the 'band". You can have a lead guitarist, a bassist, a drummer, and a singer. I've been told by my students who have played Rock Band that the lead singer job is not difficult, but it's a great idea to include people who may simply not be able to master the other parts. From what I've heard from people and what I've read the guitar and bass parts are very similar to Guitar Hero, although several people have said they believe the difficulty is a little higher on Guitar Hero than on Rock Band for those two parts. The greatest skill that is acquired playing Rock Band is the drumming. It comes with a drum kit with a foot pedal and four pads to strike. It really does require rhythm to play the drums on these songs. While the guitar and bass parts of these games don't increase your real guitar-playing skill, the drumming actually can teach you some drumming fundamentals.

It boils down to this: Guitar Hero is a much better game for those who are only interested in the guitar/bass parts of the songs or for those who can't round up a posse to play with them. Rock Band is better for those who want a great party game, sort of the ultimate karaoke. Price, of course, may be a deciding factor as well; Guitar Hero 3 and a wireless controller cost about $90; the Rock Band special edition with the microphone, drum set, and guitar runs about $160 or so.

Once we feel we've mastered the material on Guitar Hero, we'll look into getting Rock Band. Then I guess we'll need to find some friends who can play with us. We need another couple with no life, like us...

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

One thing that I find somewhat disheartening with my weight is the wide fluctuations I see day to day.  For example, I had mentioned my hope that, from my weigh-in during the weekend, I might be in the 180's sometime this week, since I was down at 190.  Yesterday morning that hope was shaken when I weighed in at 193.  But today, after no appreciable exercise or anything yesterday, I weighed in down at 190 again.  Is it just water weight?  How can that be if I take daily blood pressure medication?  Is it just food weight?  I always to try weigh in after my "morning constitutional" so to speak, so it shouldn't really be food weight.  So what is it?  It's just frustrating, because a big drop like this (almost three pounds for those of you who are mathematically challenged) gets my hopes up, only to be dashed the next day when I gain back the same weight (give or take a little).  I guess, despite my giggling at yesterday's Cathy comic strip (see yesterday's post), I need to go back to charting my weekly averages on a spreadsheet so I can see if there is an overall drop in average from week to week, since apparently following just day to day isn't going to give me any real idea of my progress.

Monday, January 07, 2008


Actually, I think my skinny fingers will come from hours and hours of Guitar Hero.  I rock.  Really.

Anyway, all my excitement was undone this morning when I weighed in at 193.  Crap.  I had really hoped that I would be down in the 180's this week, especially since I was down to 190 at one point last week.  But a weekend of not much exercise (other than Guitar Hero) and pizza and beer in front of the football games apparently means no weight loss for me.  I will try to be better this week...

Friday, January 04, 2008

It's nice to know that just returning to some semblance of routine that doesn't involve eating huge amounts every four hours or so can help my weight.  Even though I've only hit the gym once so far (heading out this afternoon to meet up with hubby at the gym), my weight has gone from 193.0 on Jan. 2 to 190.6 this morning.  Cutting back on candy and desserts is probably a big part of this weight loss.  The problem is, we brought all the candy and desserts back with us.  Both of us got candy in our stockings: 3 lbs of M&Ms, Dove candy bars and nuggets, Hersey's Kisses of various flavors, a movie-theatre-sized box of Reese's Pieces, candy canes, you name it.  How to balance eating the stuff (because God forbid we actually throw it away; there are starving kids in Africa, dontcha know) and not going crazy on it.  We'll see.  

The other factor that may weigh in (ha ha, see what I did there) when it comes to our weight loss progress is going to be one of the Christmas presents, namely a BREAD MACHINE.  We received one when we got married, and we used it so much we wore it out and killed it.  We've been home for three days and I'm already making loaf number 2 because we've almost finished number 1.  Anybody know a good bread machine recipe for a low-carb/low-calorie bread loaf?

Next week will be a complete return to normalcy for me since school and swim practice will be starting back up.  I'll start making my morning workouts beginning Monday, and I'll try to work out every afternoon in one form or another (either the gym, the pool, some weights in my classroom, or the new walking program some of the teachers are starting).  Fingers crossed; I'd love to be back down in the 180's next week!

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

I took yesterday as a rest/recovery day (the third day of a 1500-mile drive and the morning after a wine binge--man, I hate wine hangovers); today is the day of reflection and beginning anew.  And, after 365 days of 2007, I find myself in one familiar spot:

I am a fat broken record.  (For those of you unfamiliar with the concept of "broken record", replace that reference with "scratched CD".)  I looked back at my five resolutions for the year, and I didn't accomplish ANY of them.

#1--Weight loss.  I had planned to reach my ultimate weight loss goal in the past year and find myself at 150 lbs.  Ha.  I weighed in this morning at 193.  While that's pretty bad, I had actually expected it to be worse, with a Christmas dinner involving turkey, ham, AND prime rib (the carnivore in me rejoiced, but the self-restraint in me wept).  I had even reduced the amount of exercise I got by just letting the dog run loose (my husband's theory when we first let him out on the first day we were there was "Well, we've got a week to catch him"--but he actually did really well; when there was no one chasing him, he got bored and started even coming in when we called him) so I didn't have to walk him at all.  My physical tests for the week included an hour of ice skating and a few hours of skiing.  Not very impressive.  I don't know if I can reach 150 lbs this year.  Instead, I just need to get back on the weight loss track.  I'd like to be back down around 180 by the time spring break rolls around in March, but we'll see.

#2--Exercise.  I was supposed to be making it to the gym daily last year, and making my morning workouts at least three times a week.  Uh huh.  Didn't even come close.  So I need to get back on it.  Can't lose weight if I don't work out.

#3--Grading.  I didn't stay quite as caught-up as I was supposed to, but on the whole I did OK.  I just need to hang on and stay as caught-up as I can.  

#4--Blogging.  I didn't blog as often as I intended, but then again, I just don't always have much to blog about.  I'll try to be more interesting.  

#5--Organization.  I'm still hideously disorganized.  I need to get better because my husband deserves better at home, and because I'm now sharing my classroom for one class period each day with my department head.  I need to at least make it look good, right?

So anyway, here I go again.  I need to get back on it, for sure.  Stay tuned...